Advantages and Disadvantages to Search Engine Ranking Checkers

Fourth was iwebtool.com. Yet again, you implant the url and watchword. There are drop down menus for Search on (web list) and Limit search to (different results) yet every menu just offered one choice – Google and 100 results. This too recorded my url as number 1 on Google.

Fifth was marketleap.com. An “issue” was returned for this one.

Next at six was web-inspect.com. This one couldn’t find my picked url at all in Google, Yahoo, MSN, Hot Bot or Teoma.

Seventh was ineedhits.com. To use this mechanical assembly I expected to make a record and having done in that capacity, I was drawn nearer to put a catch on my site. Results were: Google – higher than 100, Yahoo – number 25 and Bing – number 50.

Next, at number eight came linkassistant.com. Rank Tracker is a bit of SEO Power Suite which you can download free or paid. I recently had this appreciation to my encouraging record so I associated my url and it returned number 1 on Google and number 25 on both Yahoo and Bing. I genuinely like this device; it causes an endeavor for google api check keyword position you and you to can complete a wide scope of things with it – past any sensible add up to make reference to here as it’s meriting an article without any other individual.

Number nine reestablished the FAQ page at digitalpoint.com – devices. I finally discovered that I expected to enroll here too so I didn’t inconvenience.

Finally at ten, Rank Checker from SEObook.com. This is a free download for which you have to enroll. As far as anyone knows, it is available for Firefox. It’s definitely not hard to use; just snap on the logo on your status bar in Firefox, insert the url and indistinguishable number of watchwords from you like and there you appear to be. Results can be downloaded in CSV gathering. My url was #1 on Google, #19 on Yahoo and #25 on Bing.

So my picks for a web file rank checker reliant on these results would either be Rank Tracker (no. 8) and Rank Checker (no. 10) which returned basically comparable results.

Leave a Comment